Your figures, run under Alberta's own rules — the division the statute actually sets out, not a generic 50/50. Rough figures are fine; the answer appears as you type and nothing is sent anywhere.
Once you know the figure, the real work is keeping track of it: every value you entered above will arrive again by letter — revised, argued, and revised again over months.
Upload each one as it arrives — theirs and yours.
Every value, date and claimed exclusion, with the exact sentence it came from.
Their $380,000 house becomes $420,000? You’ll know which letter did it, and when.
Family Property Act, RSA 2000, c F-4.7, read at the province’s own official source. This section is generated from the same verified rules the arithmetic runs on.
| The model | The divisible property itself is divided, presumptively equally, with exemptions coming off the top to their owner. |
|---|---|
| Who it covers | FPA: married spouses — and aIRA s.3(1)(a): three years of interdependence. |
| What it’s valued at | the date of trial, unless a written agreement under s.38 sets another date (FPA s.7(2.1)). |
| Something owned before the relationship | Its value when the relationship began is exempt; what the growth since does is the court’s discretion, which is why part of this province’s answer is a range. |
| Why part of the answer is a range | Growth on exempt property is divided at the court’s discretion — anything from none of it to half. The calculator shows the range rather than pretending to know. |
Yes — aIRA s.3(1)(a): three years of interdependence.
Its value when the relationship began is exempt; what the growth since does is the court’s discretion, which is why part of this province’s answer is a range.
It is the division the statute starts from. Part of this province’s answer is judicial discretion, and the calculator shows that part as a range rather than a figure.